Studies Show Palo Azul Has 8x More Antioxidant Capacity Than Regular Tea

palo azul vs green tea antioxidants

That's right! According to several studies which tested the polyphenolic content and antioxidant capacity of palo azul and regular teas, palo azul showed around 8 times higher values.

Some of the standard tests for measuring antioxidant capacity are the Folin-Ciocalteau TPC (Total Phenolic Content), ORAC (Oxygen Radical Absorption Capacity), DPPH, and TEAC. Fortunately, there are studies on the palo azul bark which have used all these methods to test its antioxidant capacity. Below, we delve deeper into what each of these tests showed for palo azul in comparison to regular teas, yerba mate, spirulina, and other compounds.

1.) Folin-Ciocalteau TPC (Total Phenolic Content)

palo azul vs green tea antioxidant

TPC scores summary: Palo azul had around 2 to 8 times higher phenolic content than green, black, and yellow teas, and it had around 4 times higher TPC than spirulina/algae.

  • Palo azul = 856.5
  • Yellow tea = 325-438
  • Green tea = 106-430
  • Black tea = 122-390
  • Spirulina/algae = 192.8
  • Moringa = 170.07
  • Butterfly pea = 239
  • Yerba mate = 132.5

The Folin–Ciocalteu (F-C) reaction is an antioxidant assay based on electron transfer, which measures the reductive capacity of an antioxidant. It has been widely applied in determination of the total phenol/polyphenol content of plant-derived food and biological samples.

This 2014 study found that palo azul’s total phenolic content was 856.50 ± 13.53 mg gallic acid / ml.

This study found that black tea, green tea, and white tea had total phenolic content of 122-390, 106-430, 325-438 mg gallic acid/mL, respectively. Another study tested 30 varieties of  green, black, oolong, white, yellow and dark teas and their total phenolic content was 24.77 ± 2.02 to 252.65 ± 4.74 mg gallic acid / ml. This study found that black tea had total phenolic content of 99.8 mg-131.9 mg/g 

The same study showed that yerba mate had a TPC of 120.4 mg-132.5 mg/g

This study found that spirulina platensis (blue-green algae) had a total phenolic content of 17-43.2 mg/g, and the algae with the highest phenolic content was Eisenia bicyclis, with a TPC of around 192.8 mg/g.

This study found that moringa had a TPC of 170.07 ± 0.43 mg /100 g gallic acid and another study found that moringa had a TPC of 88.05 ± 1.08 mg/g.

This study found that butterfly pea had a TPC of 185-239 mg/100g.

palo azul vs green tea antioxidants
The cool thing about palo azul tea, is that you can literally see the polyphenolic content, because studies show that palo azul's blue color is caused by fluorescent flavonoids (polyphenols). That's why palo azul looks blue when it absorbs light and it exhibits this incredible deep blue color which is an indication of the high polyphenolic content! 


2.)  DPPH - IC50 

palo azul vs green tea antioxidants

IC50 scores summary: *The lower the IC50, the higher the antioxidant activity. Palo azul had 8.7 to 26.5 times higher antioxidant capacity than green tea and black tea respectively, and it had around 20 times higher capacity than spirulina.

  • Palo azul = 2.02
  • Moringa = 8.06
  • Butterfly pea = 11.97
  • Matcha tea = 12.08
  • Green tea = 17.62
  • Black tea = 53.66
  • Spirulina = 40.99
  • Vitamin C = 53.24

This study explains what the DPPH test is: “The IC50 is the concentration of an antioxidant-containing substance required to scavenge 50% of the initial DPPH radicals. The lower the IC50 value, the more potent is the substance at scavenging DPPH and this implies a higher antioxidant activity.”

This 2014 study concluded the following about palo azul: “The result showed that EP (palo azul) possesses a moderate scavenging activity with IC50 = 2.02 ± 0.98 μg/ml.” Moreover, the researchers found that the “free radical scavenging activity of EP showed 98.32% and ascorbic acid (vitamin C) 86.53% at the same concentrations.” 

palo azul vs vitamin c

For reference, this study showed that vitamin C (ascorbic acid) had an IC50 of  53.24±0.82

This study found that black tea and green tea had an IC50 of 53.66±4.57, and 17.62±1.76 respectively. 

This study found that moringa had an IC50 of 8.06 ± 0.29 μg/ml.

This study found that butterfly pea had an IC50 of 11.97±0.38a.

This study on matcha tea found that it had DPPH IC50 scavenging levels of 12.08 to 23.48. Another study showed that matcha tea had a DPPH IC50 value of 28.74 ± 1.57.

This study about spirulina found that its antioxidative peptides "exhibited  high  antioxidant activity at IC50 40.99 µg/mL."


Why is palo azul’s antioxidant capacity so much higher than regular tea?

palo azul vs green tea antioxidants

According to these numbers, this would imply that palo azul’s antioxidant capacity was 8.7 to 26.5 times higher than green tea and black tea respectively!

This study explains why processed tea leaves have a lower DPPH  and total phenolic content:

“As with DPPH Radical Scavenging Activity, the IC50 value and total polyphenol also decreased with each processing step of green tea and black tea. The decrease can be caused by oxidation, such as in the OTR (open top roller) machine. The wet sorting process also slightly decreases the antioxidant content of tea because in this process the sifted tea shoots have more contact with air in the presence of particles that are already small in size.”

Therefore, the researchers concluded that “processing reduces the DPPH Radical Scavenging Activity value, IC50 value, total  polyphenols and catechin and EGCG values of green tea and black tea.”


3.) TEAC - ABTS 

palo azul tea and antioxidant fruits

TEAC scores summary: 

  • Palo azul = 98.34%
  • Spirulina = 90%
  • Green tea = 78.2%
  • BHT = 99.42%

In layman’s terms, the TEAC measures the antioxidants capacity to scavenge free radicals (ABTS) in comparison to Trolox, which is a synthetic vitamin E. 

This study explains exactly what the TEAC test is: 

“The trolox equivalent antioxidant capacity (TEAC) assay was first developed as a simple and convenient method for total antioxidant capacity (TAC) determination. The assay measures the ability of antioxidants to scavenge the stable radical cation ABTS (2,2′-azinobis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid)). Antioxidants can neutralize the radical cation, generated from ABTS, by either direct reduction via electron donation or by radical quenching via hydrogen atom donation.”

This study explains that the “TEAC reflects the ability of antioxidants to scavenge the ABTS radical-cation compared with Trolox."

Trolox is a water-soluble analog of vitamin E. It is an antioxidant like vitamin E and it is used in biological or biochemical applications to reduce oxidative stress or damage.

This 2014 study found that “the percentage inhibition was 98.34% for the extract (palo azul) and 99.42% for BHT at 0.1 mg/ml concentration. From the results obtained, it is anticipated that EP is a more efficient scavenger than standard ascorbic acid.” The researchers mention that “the methanol/water extract of EP was fast and effective scavengers of the ABTS radical and this activity was comparable to that of BHT.”

Butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT) is a most commonly used antioxidant recognized as safe for use in foods containing fats, pharmaceuticals, petroleum products, rubber and oil industries.

This study on green tea concluded that "the %-inhibition (78.2%) of a 24-h-aged, 2.5-g-sample of tea brewed at 4 °C is approximately 40% higher than that (55.5%) of 1-h-aged green tea."

This study showed that spirulina platensis had a DPPH radical inhibition of 90%.


4.) ORAC (Oxygen radical absorbent capacity)

free radicals antioxidant

ORAC score summary: 

  • Palo azul = 74.28%
  • Quercetin = 70.45%
  • Trolox = 64.12%

This 2014 study explains that ORAC is a method used to measure the scavenging activity of peroxyl radicals.

The same study concluded the following about palo azul: “The results showed EP with the ORAC + value of 6.12 ± 1.28 μmol α-tocopherol.”


palo azul ORAC antioxidant capacity

The study also found that “a 50 μg/ml solution of EP and quercetin exhibited 74% and 70.45% inhibition, respectively. NO (nitrous oxide) scavenging capacity of extract was higher than that of quercetin. The EP observed value indicates that the bark extract is a better hydroxyl radical scavenger than the standards BHT, Trolox and mannitol with values of 74.28, 73.59, 64.12 and 69.67%, respectively.”

Moreover, they showed that “EP had a superoxide radical scavenging activity (62.19% inhibition), which was greater than that of reference antioxidant (52.97% inhibition) at the same concentrations (P < 0.05).”


palo azul antioxidants

The researchers from the previously cited 2014 study concluded that “the ORAC, ABTS and DPPH values indicated that EP possesses significant radical quenching properties. EP has the best antioxidants of ascorbic acid and BHT, suggesting that EP is able to chelate metals.”

This 2015 study found that “PAM (palo azul) possesses strong activity in XO (xanthine oxidase) and LOX (lipoxygenase) enzyme inhibition compared to that produced by allopurinol and quercetin.”

palo azul vs quercetin

Xanthine oxidase (XO) is a form of xanthine oxidoreductase, a type of enzyme that generates reactive oxygen species. 

Allopurinol is in a class of medications called xanthine oxidase inhibitors.

palo azul tea and fruits antioxidant


From the studies we reviewed here, it appears that palo azul has a considerably higher amount of polyphenols and antioxidant capacity in comparison to other compounds such as green tea, black tea, spirulina, yerba mate, quercetin, and vitamin C. So now you know, when you see palo azul's blue color...that's an indication of its polyphenolic rich content and that's what gives it its powerful antioxidant capacity!

magiktea palo azul logo

When you see the blue...
that's where the magic is! 😉



Clinical Studies

Palo azul is also known as: Eysenhardtia polystachya (E. polystachya, E.P), Cyclolepis genistoides (C. genistoides), kidney wood and palo dulce


(2014) Evaluation of antidiabetic, antioxidant and antiglycating activities of the Eysenhardtia polystachya

(2015) Evaluation of anti-inflammatory activity of the bark of Eysenhardtia polystachya in experimental animal models

(2016) Properties of Flavonoids Isolated from the Bark of Eysenhardtia polystachya and Their Effect on Oxidative Stress in Streptozotocin-Induced Diabetes Mellitus in Mice

(2017) Folin–Ciocalteu method for the measurement of total phenolic content and antioxidant capacity

(2018) Modeling of Total Phenolic contents in Various Tea samples by Experimental Design Methods

(2019) Phenolic Profiles and Antioxidant Activities of 30 Tea Infusions from Green, Black, Oolong, White, Yellow and Dark Teas

(2006)  Effects of extraction solvents on concentration and antioxidant activity of black and black mate tea polyphenols determined by ferrous tartrate and Folin–Ciocalteu methods

(2015) Phenolic Content and Antioxidant Capacity in Algal Food Products

(2015) In vitro evaluation of the antioxidant potential, phenolic and flavonoid contents of the stem bark ethanol extract of Anogeissus leiocarpus

(2017) Effect of Processing on Green and Black Tea DPPH Radical Scavenging Activity, IC 50 Value, Total Polyphenols, Catechin and Epigallocatechin Gallate content

(2018) Antioxidant Activity of Methanol Extract from Several Indonesian Green Teas

Trolox Equivalent Antioxidant Capacity

(2015) Understanding the chemistry behind the antioxidant activities of butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT): a review

(2021) Effect of Brewing Temperature on the Total Antioxidant Capacity of Green Tea

(2017) Antioxidant Activity of Purified Active Peptide Derived from Spirulina platensis Enzymatic Hydrolysates

(2018) Antioxidant Activity of Different Forms of Green Tea: Loose Leaf, Bagged and Matcha

(2020) Antioxidant Properties and Nutritional Composition of Matcha Green Tea

Leave a comment